Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Campaigns
Media
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Campaigns
Media
Voters
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Campaigns
Media
Voters
It matters whether the polls get it right
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
How do they work?
How do we use them to forecast an election?
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
How do they work?
How do we use them to forecast an election?
How have they done in the past?
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
How do they work?
How do we use them to forecast an election?
How have they done in the past?
But first...
A quick survey:
A poll is a survey conducted on sample from a population
The theory of polling depends on the power of random sampling
The practice of polling tries to account and adjust for all the ways a poll can fall short of this theoretical ideal
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Survey instrument: What the survey asked
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Survey instrument: What the survey asked
Survey weights: Adjustments to make the survey more representative of the population
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Survey instrument: What the survey asked
Survey weights: Adjustments to make the survey more representative of the population
Likely voter model: A way of distinguishing (likely) voters from non-voters
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Survey instrument: What the survey asked
Survey weights: Adjustments to make the survey more representative of the population
Likely voter model: A way of distinguishing (likely) voters from non-voters
Margin of error: A range of plausible values for the true population value
The population is unknown
Response rates are low
Response rates differ
Adjustments are imperfect and uncertain
Total Survey Error in election polling is a function of:
Sampling Error
Temporal Error
Non-Sampling Error
Total Survey Error in election polling is a function of:
Sampling Error:
That error that arises from sampling from a population
Sample Size \(\uparrow\) \(\to\) Sampling error \(\downarrow\)
Margins of error typically only reflect sampling error
Total Survey Error in election polling is a function of:
Sampling Error:
Temporal Error:
The error that comes from polling a dynamic race at specific point in time
Polls closer to the election \(\to\) Temporal Error \(\downarrow\)
Total Survey Error in election polling is a function of:
Sampling Error:
Temporal Error:
Non-sampling Error:
$$ \begin{align} MoE &= \pm 4.9 \\ &= 1.96 *\sqrt{((p*(1-p))/405)}\\ &= 1.96 *\sqrt{((0.5*(1-0.5))/405)}\\ &= \pm 4.869659 \end{align} $$
Two criteria
Did the poll call the race correctly?
Did the poll get the margin right?
Election forecasts reflect varying combinations of:
Forecasts differ in the extent to which they rely on these components and how they integrate them in their final predictions
The preeminence of polling in modern forecasts reflects the success of Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight in correctly predicting the 2008 (49/50 states correct) 2012 (50/50) presidential elections
The preeminence of polling in modern forecasts reflects the success of Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight in correctly predicting the 2008 (49/50 states correct) 2012 (50/50) presidential elections
Any one poll is likely to deviate from the true outcome
Averaging over multiple polls \(\to\) more accurate predictions than any one poll, provided...
The preeminence of polling in modern forecasts reflects the success of Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight in correctly predicting the 2008 (49/50 states correct) 2012 (50/50) presidential elections
Any one poll is likely to deviate from the true outcome
Averaging over multiple polls \(\to\) more accurate predictions than any one poll, provided...
the polls aren't systematically biased
The preeminence of polling in modern forecasts reflects the success of Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight in correctly predicting the 2008 (49/50 states correct) 2012 (50/50) presidential elections
Any one poll is likely to deviate from the true outcome
Averaging over multiple polls \(\to\) more accurate predictions than any one poll, provided...
the polls aren't systematically biased
The present concerns over polling the failure of such approaches to predict
Trump's Victory in 2016
Strength of Trumps Support in 2020
Polls did a better job
Polls did a better job
Forecasts correctly call:
Polls did a better job
Forecasts correctly call:
However...
Average polling errors for national popular vote were 4.5 percentage points -- highest in 40 years
Polls overstated Biden's support by 3.9 points national polls (4.3 points in state polls)
Polls overstated Democratic support in Senate and Guberatorial races by about 6 points
Forecasts predicted Democrats would hold
Unlike 2016, no clear cut explanations for what went wrong
Not a cause:
Unlike 2016, no clear cut explanations for what went wrong
Not a cause:
Potential Explanations
What are the polls saying?
Why they might be wrong?
What are the polls saying?
Why they might be wrong?
Why they might be all right?
What are the polls saying?
Why they might be wrong?
Why they might be all right?
What do we think will influence the race more broadly?
What are the polls saying?
Why they might be wrong?
Why they might be all right?
What do we think will influence the race more broadly?
But first...
After 2016, we had a reasonable idea of what went wrong, and how to fix it (e.g. weight for education)
Lack a similar explanation for the polling errors of 2020.
AAPOR Report lays out three scenarios going forward. Problems from 2020:
After 2016, we had a reasonable idea of what went wrong, and how to fix it (e.g. weight for education)
Lack a similar explanation for the polling errors of 2020.
AAPOR Report lays out three scenarios going forward. Problems from 2020:
After 2016, we had a reasonable idea of what went wrong, and how to fix it (e.g. weight for education)
Lack a similar explanation for the polling errors of 2020.
AAPOR Report lays out three scenarios going forward. Problems from 2020:
Persist in 2022 and beyond
Are unique to Presidential Elections (Problem for 2024, but not 2022)
After 2016, we had a reasonable idea of what went wrong, and how to fix it (e.g. weight for education)
Lack a similar explanation for the polling errors of 2020.
AAPOR Report lays out three scenarios going forward. Problems from 2020:
Persist in 2022 and beyond
Are unique to Presidential Elections (Problem for 2024, but not 2022)
Unique to 2020/Covid/Trump (Not a problem )
Nate Silver makes the counterargument
Ask me November 9, 2022
Polling is hard, and getting harder
Ask me November 9, 2022
Polling is hard, and getting harder
Pollsters are innovative, and forecasts are flexible
Ask me November 9, 2022
Polling is hard, and getting harder
Pollsters are innovative, and forecasts are flexible
What's the alternative
Ask me November 9, 2022
Polling is hard, and getting harder
Pollsters are innovative, and forecasts are flexible
What's the alternative
Stop filibustering!! Will the polls get it right?
Most Likely Outcomes:
Senate:
*
(D) vs Walker (R)*
(R) vs Barnes (D)*
(D) vs Laxalt (R)*
(D) vs Masters (R)Senate:
*
(D) vs Walker (R)*
(R) vs Barnes (D)*
(D) vs Laxalt (R)*
(D) vs Masters (R)House:
Senate:
*
(D) vs Walker (R)*
(R) vs Barnes (D)*
(D) vs Laxalt (R)*
(D) vs Masters (R)House:
Governor:
Lots of things can happen between now and November 8. Here are few things we could talk about
The economy (CPI releases Oct 13, Employment Nov 4)
Dobbs v. Jackson; Reproductive Rights
Turnout (High vs low)
Demographics (Race, Gender, Age)
Individual Candidates
Joe Biden (Approval, policy)
Donald Trump (Endorsements, Legal Troubles)
Foreign Affairs (Ukraine, Taiwan, ...)
Paul Testa
Assistant Professor, Political Science
Brown University
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
Esc | Back to slideshow |
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Campaigns
Media
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Campaigns
Media
Voters
Elections have consequences
Election polling has consequences
Campaigns
Media
Voters
It matters whether the polls get it right
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
How do they work?
How do we use them to forecast an election?
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
How do they work?
How do we use them to forecast an election?
How have they done in the past?
To answer this question, we'll ask the following about polls:
How do they work?
How do we use them to forecast an election?
How have they done in the past?
But first...
A quick survey:
A poll is a survey conducted on sample from a population
The theory of polling depends on the power of random sampling
The practice of polling tries to account and adjust for all the ways a poll can fall short of this theoretical ideal
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Survey instrument: What the survey asked
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Survey instrument: What the survey asked
Survey weights: Adjustments to make the survey more representative of the population
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Survey instrument: What the survey asked
Survey weights: Adjustments to make the survey more representative of the population
Likely voter model: A way of distinguishing (likely) voters from non-voters
Pollster: Who's doing the survey
Sampling frame: A list from which the sample was drawn (e.g. a voter file)
Sample size: How many people were surveyed
Survey mode: How the survey was conducted
Survey instrument: What the survey asked
Survey weights: Adjustments to make the survey more representative of the population
Likely voter model: A way of distinguishing (likely) voters from non-voters
Margin of error: A range of plausible values for the true population value
The population is unknown
Response rates are low
Response rates differ
Adjustments are imperfect and uncertain
Total Survey Error in election polling is a function of:
Sampling Error
Temporal Error
Non-Sampling Error
Total Survey Error in election polling is a function of:
Sampling Error:
That error that arises from sampling from a population
Sample Size \(\uparrow\) \(\to\) Sampling error \(\downarrow\)
Margins of error typically only reflect sampling error
Total Survey Error in election polling is a function of:
Sampling Error:
Temporal Error:
The error that comes from polling a dynamic race at specific point in time
Polls closer to the election \(\to\) Temporal Error \(\downarrow\)
Total Survey Error in election polling is a function of:
Sampling Error:
Temporal Error:
Non-sampling Error:
$$ \begin{align} MoE &= \pm 4.9 \\ &= 1.96 *\sqrt{((p*(1-p))/405)}\\ &= 1.96 *\sqrt{((0.5*(1-0.5))/405)}\\ &= \pm 4.869659 \end{align} $$
Two criteria
Did the poll call the race correctly?
Did the poll get the margin right?
Election forecasts reflect varying combinations of:
Forecasts differ in the extent to which they rely on these components and how they integrate them in their final predictions
The preeminence of polling in modern forecasts reflects the success of Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight in correctly predicting the 2008 (49/50 states correct) 2012 (50/50) presidential elections
The preeminence of polling in modern forecasts reflects the success of Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight in correctly predicting the 2008 (49/50 states correct) 2012 (50/50) presidential elections
Any one poll is likely to deviate from the true outcome
Averaging over multiple polls \(\to\) more accurate predictions than any one poll, provided...
The preeminence of polling in modern forecasts reflects the success of Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight in correctly predicting the 2008 (49/50 states correct) 2012 (50/50) presidential elections
Any one poll is likely to deviate from the true outcome
Averaging over multiple polls \(\to\) more accurate predictions than any one poll, provided...
the polls aren't systematically biased
The preeminence of polling in modern forecasts reflects the success of Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight in correctly predicting the 2008 (49/50 states correct) 2012 (50/50) presidential elections
Any one poll is likely to deviate from the true outcome
Averaging over multiple polls \(\to\) more accurate predictions than any one poll, provided...
the polls aren't systematically biased
The present concerns over polling the failure of such approaches to predict
Trump's Victory in 2016
Strength of Trumps Support in 2020
Polls did a better job
Polls did a better job
Forecasts correctly call:
Polls did a better job
Forecasts correctly call:
However...
Average polling errors for national popular vote were 4.5 percentage points -- highest in 40 years
Polls overstated Biden's support by 3.9 points national polls (4.3 points in state polls)
Polls overstated Democratic support in Senate and Guberatorial races by about 6 points
Forecasts predicted Democrats would hold
Unlike 2016, no clear cut explanations for what went wrong
Not a cause:
Unlike 2016, no clear cut explanations for what went wrong
Not a cause:
Potential Explanations
What are the polls saying?
Why they might be wrong?
What are the polls saying?
Why they might be wrong?
Why they might be all right?
What are the polls saying?
Why they might be wrong?
Why they might be all right?
What do we think will influence the race more broadly?
What are the polls saying?
Why they might be wrong?
Why they might be all right?
What do we think will influence the race more broadly?
But first...
After 2016, we had a reasonable idea of what went wrong, and how to fix it (e.g. weight for education)
Lack a similar explanation for the polling errors of 2020.
AAPOR Report lays out three scenarios going forward. Problems from 2020:
After 2016, we had a reasonable idea of what went wrong, and how to fix it (e.g. weight for education)
Lack a similar explanation for the polling errors of 2020.
AAPOR Report lays out three scenarios going forward. Problems from 2020:
After 2016, we had a reasonable idea of what went wrong, and how to fix it (e.g. weight for education)
Lack a similar explanation for the polling errors of 2020.
AAPOR Report lays out three scenarios going forward. Problems from 2020:
Persist in 2022 and beyond
Are unique to Presidential Elections (Problem for 2024, but not 2022)
After 2016, we had a reasonable idea of what went wrong, and how to fix it (e.g. weight for education)
Lack a similar explanation for the polling errors of 2020.
AAPOR Report lays out three scenarios going forward. Problems from 2020:
Persist in 2022 and beyond
Are unique to Presidential Elections (Problem for 2024, but not 2022)
Unique to 2020/Covid/Trump (Not a problem )
Nate Silver makes the counterargument
Ask me November 9, 2022
Polling is hard, and getting harder
Ask me November 9, 2022
Polling is hard, and getting harder
Pollsters are innovative, and forecasts are flexible
Ask me November 9, 2022
Polling is hard, and getting harder
Pollsters are innovative, and forecasts are flexible
What's the alternative
Ask me November 9, 2022
Polling is hard, and getting harder
Pollsters are innovative, and forecasts are flexible
What's the alternative
Stop filibustering!! Will the polls get it right?
Most Likely Outcomes:
Senate:
*
(D) vs Walker (R)*
(R) vs Barnes (D)*
(D) vs Laxalt (R)*
(D) vs Masters (R)Senate:
*
(D) vs Walker (R)*
(R) vs Barnes (D)*
(D) vs Laxalt (R)*
(D) vs Masters (R)House:
Senate:
*
(D) vs Walker (R)*
(R) vs Barnes (D)*
(D) vs Laxalt (R)*
(D) vs Masters (R)House:
Governor:
Lots of things can happen between now and November 8. Here are few things we could talk about
The economy (CPI releases Oct 13, Employment Nov 4)
Dobbs v. Jackson; Reproductive Rights
Turnout (High vs low)
Demographics (Race, Gender, Age)
Individual Candidates
Joe Biden (Approval, policy)
Donald Trump (Endorsements, Legal Troubles)
Foreign Affairs (Ukraine, Taiwan, ...)
Paul Testa
Assistant Professor, Political Science
Brown University